Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 24 '19 at 14:46
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 694
67% 554 Pts
64-Core 1681
104% 1681 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 416.78
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 47.8
25% 39.6 fps
MRender 44.6
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 26.3
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 94 108 110 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 332
Write 134
Mixed 178
SusWrite 104
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 34.8
137% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 132
108% 154 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 80%
Sandisk S12 126GB
107GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 366 347 373 375 359 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 449
Write 351
Mixed 109
SusWrite 364
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 11.6
50% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 18.8
16% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: JC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 112 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 112
Write 102
Mixed 78
SusWrite 111
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 30
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 18.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback