AMD Myrtle

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAMD Myrtle  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Myrtle-MTS
Memory6.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '19 at 20:21
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Eng Sample: 2D3212BGMCWH2_37/34_N
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.9% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 223
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 707
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 1,863
125% 1,863 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7790
AMD(1002 0B04) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 75
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 96
20% 81.3 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 70.9
19% 64.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 21%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 127 126 134 134 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 73
SusWrite 126
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA851U6JJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 21.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 92.1
44% 92.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback