AMD Qogir

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAMD Qogir  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Qogir-MTS
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 21:25
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Eng Sample: 2D3212BGMCWH2_37/34_N
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.8% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 850
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,851
124% 1,851 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX550/550
Gigabyte(1458 22FE) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.3.2
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 21.4
16% 23.6 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 34.1
17% 26.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 17%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$36
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 55 41 56 74 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 75.1
Write 70.9
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 54.8
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-3G2JY 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 36.2
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 32
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback