Asus M4N98TD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4N98TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110414
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 22 '19 at 14:18
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 980
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 90.4
46% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 144
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
XFX(1682 3255) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 32
Parallax 49.7
33% 40.7 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 39.5
29% 35.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2201000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 85 84 86 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 187
Write 158
Mixed 127
SusWrite 82.9
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 7.5
69% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 9.2
23% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
734GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 87 84 86 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 108
Write 111
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 84.1
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55%
Great: 70%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
255GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 92 93 92 92 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 120
Write 111
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 90.4
67% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
886GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 92 93 92 92 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 150
Write 142
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 90.4
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8.8
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N98TD EVO Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4N98TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback