Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160701
Uptime	12.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '19 at 17:31
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 1,056 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 81 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 168 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 655 57% 485 Pts	64-Core 1,290 80% 1,290 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.74 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Lighting 38.8 Reflection 34.3 Parallax 28.8 32% 34 fps	MRender 50.6 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 40 34% 42.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 509GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 421 414 431 440 440 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 428 Mixed 380 SusWrite 430 96% 424 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 89.6 4K Mixed 47.3 164% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 337 256% 345 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 657GB free Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 424 419 439 442 442 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 431 Mixed 372 SusWrite 435 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 42.7 145% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 343 259% 348 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 4x8GB 833 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB RIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	MC Read 55.8 MC Write 49.5 MC Mixed 41.4 140% 48.9 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 16.6 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,243x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	958x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	412x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	418x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	386x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	287x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	349x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	209x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16