Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160701
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '19 at 19:55
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 1,056 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 76 2-Core 162 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 562 52% 436 Pts	64-Core 1,301 80% 1,301 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.78 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 41.2 Reflection 40.7 Parallax 37.4 34% 39.8 fps	MRender 50.7 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 38.5 34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 470GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 441 431 435 437 433 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 449 Write 438 Mixed 348 SusWrite 436 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 45.8 151% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 340 259% 349 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 623GB free Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 445 440 441 442 436 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 435 Mixed 376 SusWrite 441 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 87.7 4K Mixed 42.7 150% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 352 265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 4x8GB 833 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB RIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	MC Read 55.1 MC Write 49.3 MC Mixed 41.4 139% 48.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,240x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	956x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	408x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	414x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	386x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	287x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	349x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	208x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16