Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '19 at 23:27
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 137
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 407
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 32.1
19% 28.5 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 31.4
21% 24.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB3i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 174 165 165 166 166 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.8% Above average
Read 270
Write 201
Mixed 156
SusWrite 166
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 30.1
116% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 77
DQ Mixed 35.2
32% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 88%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
34GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 114 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 103
Write 116
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 112
66% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
170GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 93 88 89 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 81.4
Write 88.8
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 91.4
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 70%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
81GB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 74 71 70 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 112
Write 92.9
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 71.3
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
10GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 90 87 94 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 70.1
Write 72.8
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 92.9
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 69%
ADATA HD720 1TB
194GB free, PID a51a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 31 27 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 29.4
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 29.1
36% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 49%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 6.8 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6.2
8% 7.43 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 2400 2OZ 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback