Asrock Z77 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Performance  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJan 20 '19 at 22:28
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 215
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 440
60% 445 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.8% Good
Lighting 75.8
Reflection 78.6
Parallax 74.2
62% 76.2 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 73.6
59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
11GB free
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 127 131 120 108 106 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.2% Above average
Read 232
Write 152
Mixed 175
SusWrite 118
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 26.3
92% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 150
116% 159 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 87%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
736GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 118 126 124 132 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 131
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 126
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
154GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 85 85 87 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 93.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 85.6
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 58%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 3.2 3.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.96% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 7
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 3.4
10% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 5%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
363GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 26
Write 20
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 21.1
29% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 19.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Performance Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback