| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung RF511/RF411/RF711 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG RF511/RF411/RF711 |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110729 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 19 '19 at 15:18 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.9%
Good
|
61% 102 Pts
|
38% 305 Pts
|
23% 366 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0A5) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.89%
Terrible
|
2% 2.66 fps
|
2% 2.68 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 293 300 297 300 292 MB/s
|
85.6%
Excellent
|
86% 381 MB/s
|
105% 35.1 MB/s
|
275% 367 MB/s
|
|
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
608GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 114 111 114 106 MB/s
|
64.6%
Good
|
73% 99.7 MB/s
|
129% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 99U5469-028.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
51.9%
Above average
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
42% 14.5 GB/s
|
54% 74.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical RF511/RF411/RF711 Builds (Compare 301 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung RF511/RF411/RF711
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 86x |
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 76x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 70x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 163x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 70x |
| GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples | 68x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $227 |