Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 09:51
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 235
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 732
73% 596 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12B0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 142
Parallax 115
113% 132 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 130
Splatting 100
106% 134 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC 120GB 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1205B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 67 67 36 55 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 464
Write 76.7
Mixed 174
SusWrite 64.5
42% 195 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 6.4
79% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 25.2
62% 126 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 81%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
138GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 667 667 663 664 656 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,085
Write 1,932
Mixed 1,521
SusWrite 703
349% 1,560 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 76.1
245% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,023
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 982
723% 951 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 245%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 25.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback