Asrock K10N78D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock K10N78D  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100521
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 21:06
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 54
2-Core 107
51% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 284
29% 236 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 62.8
60% 69.3 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 67.8
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 126 41 36 28 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.9% Good
Read 242
Write 184
Mixed 201
SusWrite 73.6
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 41
134% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 156
117% 156 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
50GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 58 56 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 71.5
Write 78
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 57.6
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB
246GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 29 31 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 27.2
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 29.9
37% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K10N78D Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock K10N78D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $713
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback