Asrock K10N78D

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock K10N78D (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100521
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '19 at 21:47
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 52.2 2-Core 110 50% 79.3 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 324 34% 271 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.3% Above average	Lighting 73.9 Reflection 73.5 Parallax 63.4 60% 70.3 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 71.1 57% 70 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 177 164 118 65 34 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.1% Good	Read 254 Write 184 Mixed 211 SusWrite 124 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 41.2 135% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 162 121% 162 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 124%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 58GB free Firmware: 1AA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 54 57 62 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 69.6 Write 74.8 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 57.2 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.2 200% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 246GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 29.7 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 30.3 40% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.2% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 9.8 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.7 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K10N78D Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock K10N78D

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	2x

GPU
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	1x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	1x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
520 Series 240GBIntel $139Bench 78%, 12,595 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $712

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16