| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171228 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 18 '19 at 01:44 |
| Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99.1%
Outstanding
|
102% 189 Pts
|
88% 692 Pts
|
57% 922 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.5%
Very poor
|
18% 22.7 fps
|
22% 27.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 480 480 480 480 469 MB/s
|
131%
Outstanding
|
102% 455 MB/s
|
213% 80 MB/s
|
255% 351 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
231GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1337 316 315 312 314 313 MB/s
|
233%
Outstanding
|
255% 1,148 MB/s
|
252% 98.7 MB/s
|
674% 1,031 MB/s
|
|
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 200 199 200 199 199 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
125% 172 MB/s
|
221% 1.73 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 127 131 132 132 132 MB/s
|
67%
Good
|
84% 114 MB/s
|
218% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
|
75.1%
Very good
|
80% 28.1 GB/s
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
59% 68.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro Builds (Compare 74 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Pro
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 17x |
| Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 11x |
| Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
| RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $860 |