TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 34701F7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 34701F7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 34701F7
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 17 '19 at 13:20
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 140
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 208
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 57.4%
 Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5065GSXF 500GB
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GP006B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 52 57 58 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 48.8
Write 55.8
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 53.8
37% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 29.5%
 Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
591GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 95 96 96 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 70.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 95.4
87% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 32.9%
 Great: 44%
Seagate BUP GD 4TB
1.5TB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
Read 23
Write 23.8
Mixed 24
SusWrite 26
34% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 19.6%
 Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-093.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 49.9%
 Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback