Biostar H110MHV3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H110MHV3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 17 '19 at 04:45
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3930-$28
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 53.1
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 52.4
37% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 30.6
8-Core 78.9
6% 54.8 Pts
64-Core 69.7
4% 69.7 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Biostar(1565 3111) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6170
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 3.25
2% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 3
Splatting 6.22
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso TOP M.2 SATA 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BSMF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 35 13 40 54 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.3% Very poor
Read 58
Write 54.6
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 37.3
10% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 6.1
20% 6.63 MB/s
DQ Read 8.9
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 10.7
8% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 86%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 107GB
92GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 11 9.8 10 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 154
Write 144
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 12.7
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 107GB
89GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 13 27 10 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 184
Write 168
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 15
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.4
262% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 591GB
227GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 11 10 33 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 140
Write 121
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 17.3
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
230% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 66%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 258GB
90GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 12 11 10 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 139
Write 137
Mixed 65
SusWrite 12.1
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 76%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 596GB
241GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 11 13 11 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
Read 121
Write 138
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 15.8
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
258% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 74%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 10TB
827GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 31 55 5.1 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55% Above average
Read 162
Write 188
Mixed 101
SusWrite 27.8
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.6
349% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55%
Great: 115%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3.5TB
991GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 41 90 33 37 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 164
Write 163
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 45.5
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
238% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 107GB
74GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 10 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 173
Write 143
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 13.2
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
282GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 72 65 60 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 62.2
Write 81.8
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 60.4
81% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.4
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110MHV3 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H110MHV3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback