Biostar H110MHV3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H110MHV3  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 16 '19 at 15:17
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3930-$28
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 143
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 174
19% 152 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Biostar(1565 3111) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6170
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.38
3% 3.88 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 8.83
5% 6.02 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso TOP M.2 SATA 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BSMF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 17 65 20 13 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.4% Poor
Read 95.1
Write 73.8
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 28.7
16% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 14.7
57% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 46.6
DQ Mixed 21.6
20% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 86%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 107GB
92GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 7.8 16 34 7.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 153
Write 141
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 14.4
72% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 107GB
89GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 19 13 9.9 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 185
Write 172
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 14.3
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.1
270% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 88%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 591GB
227GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 13 8.8 9.9 8 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 155
Write 120
Mixed 83
SusWrite 10.4
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.4
251% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 66%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 258GB
90GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 12 9.4 9.2 10 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 145
Write 145
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 12.2
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 76%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 596GB
241GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 10 19 22 10 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 14
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
237% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 74%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 10TB
827GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 34 16 16 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 151
Write 182
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 27.5
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.1
334% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 115%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3.5TB
991GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 75 49 13 42 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 171
Write 179
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 58.3
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1
277% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 107GB
74GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 19 9.7 8.3 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 165
Write 162
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 11.5
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
301GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 90 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 89.1
Write 88.7
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 90.4
100% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110MHV3 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H110MHV3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback