ADD TO PC
BUILD

Apple MacBookAir3,1

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Apple MacBookAir3,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-942452F5819B1C1B
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101118
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '16 at 05:27
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9400 547 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 13.5 2-Core 38.8 28% 37.7 Pts	4-Core 38.7 8-Core 38.7 5% 38.7 Pts	64-Core 38.1 2% 38.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 320M 15 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Apple(106B 00D4) 256MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.17.12.6141 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 0.97 2% 2.07 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple TS128C 121GB 532 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJAA0201 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 868 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1517 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 433886725418 (AA) Unknown 100 100 64441024594 (AB) Unknown 100 100 101 (AD) Unknown 199 199 4298702875 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C2) HDA temperature 50 39 261994446898 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	25.4% Poor	Read 141 Write 131 Mixed 130 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 8.95 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 6.68 34% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 65.7 DQ Mixed 9.2 16% 30 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	14% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback