HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory8.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 22:40
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 276
37% 277 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.61 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.13
5% 6.18 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 135 132 137 151 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 110
Write 162
Mixed 218
SusWrite 162
37% 163 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 14.9
62% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 40.1
45% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 55%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
209GB free
Firmware: FG001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 75 74 75 74 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 71.4
Write 70.6
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 73
45% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030ED58E8W1600 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.2% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback