Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD5  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 17:08
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 127
61% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 339
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7800 GTX
Nvidia(10DE 02C2) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.83
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 0.47
2% 1.65 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB080G4 80GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 101 103 102 101 104 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.2% Above average
Read 211
Write 104
Mixed 128
SusWrite 103
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 23.1
99% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 26.2
53% 109 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3250824ACE 250GB
117GB free
Firmware: .3CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 63 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 60.4
Mixed 39
SusWrite 62.5
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 6 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 7.8
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback