Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 75 1-Core 66.8 2-Core 132 55% 91.4 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 376 38% 309 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gainward(10B0 1B82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82% Excellent	Lighting 100 Reflection 128 Parallax 115 82% 114 fps	MRender 91.1 Gravity 116 Splatting 97.5 83% 102 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 343 347 383 388 385 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 412 Mixed 335 SusWrite 355 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 40.4 142% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 259 189% 247 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 124%
Ct960bx2 0 960GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 385GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 343 346 111 107 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 408 Write 388 Mixed 130 SusWrite 211 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 32.6 108% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 102 94% 146 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 115%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49 13,478 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 298GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 342 344 380 385 383 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 468 Write 378 Mixed 326 SusWrite 353 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 36.2 129% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 194 148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.1 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 90.4 44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	29x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16