Gigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '19 at 21:30
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 95.6
1-Core 97
2-Core 187
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 477
51% 408 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 733 465 440 465 401 296 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 148 148 149 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 164
Write 140
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 148
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
461GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 108 108 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 106
Write 97.8
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 107
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Guerrilla Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback