Gigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111212
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 14 '19 at 13:58
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 95.4
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 194
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 481
52% 411 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Nano-$450
CLim: 1060 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Lighting 79.8
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 115
65% 84.8 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 85.5
Splatting 76.2
61% 73.8 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 767 465 464 451 289 299 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 150 149 150 149 151 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 144
Write 136
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 149
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
461GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 107
67% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Guerrilla Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback