Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJan 14 '19 at 07:18
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 97.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 263
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 830
79% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,090
68% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.7% Good
Lighting 81.1
Reflection 82.4
Parallax 70.8
66% 78.1 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 77
62% 75.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 171 170 169 168 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 881
Mixed 609
SusWrite 228
172% 778 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 47.9
226% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 916
DQ Mixed 644
577% 874 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 181%
Great: 236%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
187GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 375 475 388 446 401 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 158
Mixed 332
SusWrite 428
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 26.9
126% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 269
264% 408 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 105%
Great: 182%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
113GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 676 339 335 329 331 333 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,993
Write 1519
Mixed 620
SusWrite 391
250% 1,131 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 53.1
229% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1048
DQ Write 1200
DQ Mixed 910
744% 1,053 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 222%
Great: 236%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 64GB
19GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 60 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 85.8
Write 15.7
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 65.4
62% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.6
105% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 40%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 169 173 171 174 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 169
Write 166
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 172
177% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 26.7
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 30.8
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 49.3
81% 49.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback