Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime22.2 Days
Run DateJan 14 '19 at 04:48
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 107
2-Core 209
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 511
53% 427 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 49.6
31% 40.5 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 37.9
28% 33.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
579GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 366 330 177 173 180 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 459
Write 418
Mixed 422
SusWrite 267
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 39.7
129% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 43
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 63.4
55% 78.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
596GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 80 92 90 85 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 60.3
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 88
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 67%
H/W RAID 0 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 41 40 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 30
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 39.9
26% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $247
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback