Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 01:41
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 277
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 631
72% 562 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 152
Parallax 129
115% 141 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 140
Splatting 113
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 957 647 627 597 584 562 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,227
Write 2,327
Mixed 1,052
SusWrite 662
350% 1,567 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 95.3
325% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,523
DQ Write 1,342
DQ Mixed 1,404
1,060% 1,423 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 294%
Great: 372%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
280GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 437 439 439 438 439 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 361
Write 422
Mixed 324
SusWrite 438
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 33.7
151% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 179
155% 222 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
220GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 438 440 440 439 440 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 367
Write 459
Mixed 369
SusWrite 439
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 42.8
166% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 256
218% 319 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Terra Master DAS 4TB
911GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 118 118 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 119
Write 85.5
Mixed 76
SusWrite 116
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 124%
Terra Master DAS 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 140 141 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 107
Write 137
Mixed 111
SusWrite 140
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
305% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 124%
Terra Master DAS 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 150 149 147 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 164
Write 117
Mixed 82
SusWrite 147
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3535 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 33.6
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 46.6
SC Mixed 32.1
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 49.7
80% 49.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA Builds (Compare 1,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback