Asus PRIME Z370-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A II  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 13:28
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,045
102% 838 Pts
64-Core 1,317
82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 106%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 90.8
59% 75.3 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 80
58% 69.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 459 459 469 475 462 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 393
Mixed 254
SusWrite 466
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 43.2
142% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 269
222% 320 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
5GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 68 72 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47% Average
Read 88.7
Write 82
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 75
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47%
Great: 74%
USB DISK 4GB
3GB free, PID b155
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.6 6.7 7.1 6.7 5.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.52% Terrible
Read 27
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 6.3
11% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
94% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.52%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.6% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 23.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A II Builds (Compare 2,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A II - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback