Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 03:36
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2320 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 162
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 303
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$77
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 80 80 85 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 358
Write 355
Mixed 246
SusWrite 80.7
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 32.1
107% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 43.7
40% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
644GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 166 168 168 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 164
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 166
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 109%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
478GB free
Firmware: 01.01V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 79 80 85 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 86.3
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 80.6
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
20GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 74 75 73 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 115
Mixed 68
SusWrite 74.5
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$38
147GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 74 75 73 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 90
Write 84.3
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 74.4
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 116 116 118 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 115
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 68%
Generic- SD/MMC 1GB
0GB free, PID 6364
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.63% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 4.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.3
6% 5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.63%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 04CB Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77M-D3H Builds (Compare 874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H - $145

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback