Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '19 at 14:36
Run Duration	383 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 116 2-Core 256 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 757 78% 628 Pts	64-Core 1,035 64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2877 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.2% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 45.7 Parallax 37.1 32% 40.8 fps	MRender 56.9 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 51.7 41% 49.5 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 32 39 21 27 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 508 Write 393 Mixed 397 SusWrite 37.6 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 48.2 155% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 98.4 122% 213 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 124%
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GB 6,836 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 160GB free Firmware: Q0410A SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 33 39 21 27 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 510 Write 393 Mixed 402 SusWrite 37.7 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 93.9 4K Mixed 51.6 173% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 110 128% 219 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 123%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AN10003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 59 59 60 60 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 59 Write 35.3 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 57.8 36% 49.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 59%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 103 108 103 108 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 115 Write 107 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 105 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 121 114 120 117 121 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 108 Write 108 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 118 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 546GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 96 99 96 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 104 Write 103 Mixed 72 SusWrite 98.1 70% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 970GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 98 100 97 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 96 Write 93.5 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 98.3 67% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 396GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 81 84 81 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 93.5 Write 92.8 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 82.4 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 837GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 31 39 21 27 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 5.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 165 171 166 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 161 Mixed 97 SusWrite 169 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 97%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 111 125 122 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 118 Write 128 Mixed 51 SusWrite 118 139% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 56%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 890GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 31 39 21 27 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	353% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 391 Mixed 359 SusWrite 36 400% 324 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 86.4 4K Mixed 49.2 4,709% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 93.1 13,726% 206 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 353% Great: 353%
ST330006 51AS 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 668GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 54 60 61 61 61 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 112 Write 110 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 57.7 113% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 56%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 54 60 61 61 61 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.5% Below average	Read 125 Write 108 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 57.7 112% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 353%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 2x8GB 776 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 25.3 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 21.4 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

CPU
Core i7-5930KIntel $143Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	564x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	541x
Core i7-5960XIntel $400Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	470x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	217x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	199x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $90Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $939

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359