PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180827 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 08 '19 at 03:54 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700K-$263
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$113
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 248 162 120 128 78 MB/s
|
90.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
920GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 157 154 157 157 156 MB/s
|
92.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
VERBATIM 4GB
2GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4 5.2 6 6 5.9 MB/s
|
4.89%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
93.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $263Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 534x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 320x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 211x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples | 202x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 160x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 131x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $772 |