QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	68.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '19 at 21:55
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 52 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 51.4 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 146 53% 94.1 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 536 52% 428 Pts	64-Core 611 38% 611 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6170) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.4% Good	Lighting 81.5 Reflection 93 Parallax 87 66% 87.2 fps	MRender 90.7 Gravity 85.8 Splatting 88.6 72% 88.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 525GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 223 217 238 230 247 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.3% Below average	Read 251 Write 284 Mixed 266 SusWrite 237 59% 260 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 7.8 25% 7.83 MB/s	DQ Read 44.2 DQ Write 43.4 DQ Mixed 44.1 33% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 74%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 643GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 312 15 7.4 29 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.6% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 12.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	8x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	7x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	5x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	22x
2x16GBQEMUBench 108%, 1,370 samples	12x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16