Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '19 at 21:13
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 161 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 344 38% 300 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Lighting 38.2 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 36.5 31% 34.8 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 34.7 29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 90 89 85 83 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.5% Poor	Read 165 Write 173 Mixed 136 SusWrite 87 32% 140 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 14.3 49% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 41.2 DQ Mixed 28.9 22% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 114%
Adata SP900NS38 256GB 685 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 100GB free Firmware: 5.8.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 94 91 89 87 86 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.5% Poor	Read 150 Write 165 Mixed 154 SusWrite 88.9 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 13 44% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 15.9 DQ Write 41.4 DQ Mixed 19.8 18% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 186GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 120 119 119 120 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 120 Write 32 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 117 59% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 9E CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 ID:02 9E CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 ID:02 9E CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 ID:02 9E CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 52GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.9% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 12 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 11.9 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	58x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98