ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM 3850 M2 / x3950 M2 -[72332RG]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	IBM 3850 M2 / x3950 M2 -[72332RG]- (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM Node1 Processor Card
Memory	29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '19 at 16:48
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7420 Node 1 CPU 3, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34% Below average	Memory 45.5 1-Core 30.5 2-Core 60.9 29% 45.6 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 209 20% 166 Pts	64-Core 242 15% 242 Pts

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID-MR10k 438GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 21 20 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.6% Above average	Read 156 Write 20.9 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 20.2 43% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 67%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB 273 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 26GB free, PID 5500, Philips USB Flash Drive Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 26 25 26 26 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 30.4 Write 21.9 Mixed 10 SusWrite 23 27% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.1 69% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 32GB 5,781 User benchmarks, average bench 53% null MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback