HP p6-2335ea

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP p6-2335ea  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140616
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '19 at 18:57
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 114
55% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 116
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
MSI(1462 249F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.26 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.17
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
588GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 64 103 97 37 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 65.5
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 76
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40%
Great: 68%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
544GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 29 28 30 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 25.1
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 26.5
35% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2335ea Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2335ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback