Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '19 at 16:22
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 96.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 266
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 726
71% 583 Pts
64-Core 734
45% 734 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
MSI(1462 C307) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 138
Parallax 117
103% 127 fps
MRender 99
Gravity 122
Splatting 103
88% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 286 275 279 281 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 493
Mixed 406
SusWrite 298
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 64.1
217% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
158GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 300 299 301 302 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 494
Mixed 410
SusWrite 316
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 65.4
223% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 125%
Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 104 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 74.4
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 103
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
746GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 151 154 153 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 148
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 152
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
13GB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 95 95 97 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 118
Write 90.3
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 95.5
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 97%
SanDisk Clip Sport 8GB
4GB free, PID 74e7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Read 12
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 0.6
5% 4.88 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 5%
SanDisk Clip Sport 32GB
28GB free, PID 74e7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.6 6.1 5.7 6.1 5.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 13.7
Write 6.7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 5.6
11% 8.8 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.1
209% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.3% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.5
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback