Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '19 at 20:21
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60% Good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 70 2-Core 133 58% 94.6 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 288 32% 253 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% XFX(1682 3264) 2GB CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Lighting 25.8 Reflection 27.4 Parallax 30.7 21% 28 fps	MRender 24.4 Gravity 20.5 Splatting 32.5 22% 25.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,287 Write 2,464 Mixed 2580 617% 2,777 MB/s	4K Read 216 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 139 574% 162 MB/s	DQ Read 516 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 417 314% 425 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 284GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 61 61 61 62 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	38% Below average	Read 72 Write 59.5 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 60.2 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 43%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 10GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 126 127 126 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 122 Write 116 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 126 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 174 177 178 176 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 181 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 177 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.4 163% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$76 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 10GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 92 93 94 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 58.2 Write 61.5 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 92.9 48% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 464GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 79 79 80 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 86.3 Write 74.3 Mixed 81 SusWrite 78 60% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLE4G3D1608DE1TX0. Kingston 9905403-111.A00LF BLE4G3D1608DE1TX0. Kingston 9905403-111.A00LF 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.2% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 13.8 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	7x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	3x
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	3x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 350 samples	2x
Team-Elite-1333 Team-Elite-1333 16GBUnknownBench 41%, 48 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $285

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16