Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Memory 50.9 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 40.1 26% 37.2 Pts	4-Core 76.9 8-Core 71.5 10% 74.2 Pts	64-Core 77.2 5% 77.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 84 89 83 85 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 429 Write 90.7 Mixed 129 SusWrite 84.4 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 11.6 62% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 80 DQ Mixed 27 40% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 65%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 21 25 19 17 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 130 Write 21.7 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 21.6 49% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.6 86% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KN2M64-ETF 1x8GB 318 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.7% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 6.7 21% 7.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
545s Series 128GBIntelBench 76%, 2,701 samples	1x

RAM
99U5428-018.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 48%, 37 samples	1x
CMSO8GX3M2C1600C11 8GBCorsairBench 19%, 3 samples	1x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16