Alienware Aurora-R3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 046MHW
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 01:40
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$182
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 178
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 457
50% 394 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000
Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.5GB
CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 9% Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 361 361 363 362 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 456
Write 338
Mixed 271
SusWrite 356
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 24.7
101% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 90.4
92% 154 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 99%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
913GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 139 139 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 132
Write 131
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 139
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
753GB free
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 116 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 121
Write 116
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 117
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 74%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
248GB free
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 117 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 117
Write 115
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 116
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.2
195% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 68%
USB Flash Memory 2GB
0GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.7 5.4 5.7 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.4
9% 9.08 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP655409-150 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R3 Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Alienware Aurora-R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $607
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback