Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181209
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 02 '19 at 22:08
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 905
85% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,384
86% 1,384 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 173
Parallax 177
131% 170 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 165
Splatting 116
107% 133 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1149 847 846 841 843 847 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,870
Write 2,077
Mixed 1628
SusWrite 896
364% 1,618 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 62.4
214% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 641
DQ Mixed 858
626% 822 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 232%
Great: 284%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
139GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7145
Write 5,446
Mixed 5,784
1,362% 6,125 MB/s
4K Read 409
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 299
1,141% 323 MB/s
DQ Read 1156
DQ Write 807
DQ Mixed 933
710% 965 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$230
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 158 156 156 151 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 145
Write 154
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 154
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 121%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 131 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 82.7
Write 93
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 130
65% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 163 165 164 155 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 134
Write 150
Mixed 114
SusWrite 160
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.7
350% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 94%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
2TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 185 185 185 187 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 183
Write 108
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 183
178% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 32.3
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 28.8
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $525
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback