Today's hottest deals

MSI Z170A TOMAHAWK (MS-7970)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7970
MotherboardMSI Z170A TOMAHAWK (MS-7970)  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180630
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJan 02 '19 at 00:55
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 145
2-Core 272
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 553
74% 551 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
MSI(1462 3230) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 91.4
Reflection 95.7
Parallax 84.3
74% 90.5 fps
Gravity 82.2
Splatting 69.2
66% 75.7 fps
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 8.4 87 20 94 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 390
Write 352
Mixed 268
SusWrite 64.8
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 23
129% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 99.5
DQ Mixed 1
36% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$55
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 145 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 142
Write 142
Mixed 82
SusWrite 139
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FADP 12GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 20.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A TOMAHAWK (MS-7970) Builds (Compare 846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z170A TOMAHAWK (MS-7970) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $731
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback