ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	empty empty
Motherboard	TYAN S7010
Memory	6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101112
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '19 at 13:16
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5690 4,873 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 175 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 502 52% 416 Pts	64-Core 621 38% 621 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000 751 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.5GB CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Lighting 12 Reflection 18.8 Parallax 12.9 10% 14.5 fps	MRender 20.7 Gravity 9.7 Splatting 15.5 12% 15.3 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 115 109 108 107 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.4% Above average	Read 247 Write 240 Mixed 233 SusWrite 111 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 26.1 83% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 194 146% 193 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 128 126 118 120 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 163 Write 112 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 122 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 114%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 211GB free Firmware: 04.04V06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 117 115 115 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 123 Write 124 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 115 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.3 234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 69%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 13,609 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 216GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 165 165 192 186 192 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 144 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 181 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.3 316% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 213%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 117GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 64 63 64 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 63.5 98% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,591 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 962GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 64 63 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 92.2 Write 93.7 Mixed 39 SusWrite 64 94% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,977 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 477GB free, PID a207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 94 92 85 86 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 147 Write 140 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 87.9 124% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 897GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 27.5 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 21.2 34% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.3 111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965426-028.A00LF 9965426-003.A01LF 9965426-003.A01LF 9965426-028.A00LF 9965426-003.A01LF 9965426-028.A00LF 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.8% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 18.1 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.6 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback