Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '19 at 00:55
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3450 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 397
54% 401 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Gigabyte(1458 228E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 91.1
0% 51.1 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 60
Splatting 79.1
56% 67.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$86
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 200 202 196 196 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 476
Write 459
Mixed 268
SusWrite 204
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 39.7
149% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 243
194% 270 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
134GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 309 309 310 308 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 469
Mixed 447
SusWrite 330
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 44.5
162% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 300
226% 301 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
236GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 84.5
Write 83.8
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 85.3
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 50%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
406GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 95.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 87.8
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston K531R8-HYA 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-D3H Builds (Compare 1,661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback