Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 18:49
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3450 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 399
54% 403 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Gigabyte(1458 228E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 66
Parallax 89.5
60% 76.4 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 63.4
Splatting 84
60% 71.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$77
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 200 193 193 187 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 463
Mixed 313
SusWrite 202
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 39.3
151% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 255
201% 278 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
173GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 447 401 308 308 309 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 472
Mixed 447
SusWrite 355
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 43.8
160% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 286
217% 291 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
196GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 85 85 86 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49% Average
Read 85.5
Write 83
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 85.2
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49%
Great: 50%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
446GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 96
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 104
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston K531R8-HYA 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-D3H Builds (Compare 1,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $555
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback