Dell Precision T1700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T1700
MotherboardDell Precision T1700  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 20:50
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3-$256
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 376
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 109
Parallax 99
84% 104 fps
MRender 92.4
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 85.1
74% 91.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 72 68 52 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 233
Write 104
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 66.3
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 9.8
68% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 80.6
DQ Mixed 45.1
54% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
103GB free
Firmware: MN6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 87.5
Write 84.6
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 78.3
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 01BA Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 18.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 21
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1700 Builds (Compare 2,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback