Foxconn A74ML-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardFoxconn A74ML-K  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100716
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 18:46
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4450B-$21
Socket 940, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 53.9
1-Core 32.5
2-Core 57.8
32% 48.1 Pts
4-Core 55.7
8-Core 49.8
7% 52.8 Pts
64-Core 58
4% 58 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 405
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 0.56
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 2.43
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 86 90 88 69 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 42.4
Write 53.7
Mixed 41
SusWrite 82.6
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 0.8
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A74ML-K Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A74ML-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback