Acer Aspire T160

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Aspire T160 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer FC51GM
Memory	1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20060714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '18 at 11:24
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+ 10 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Memory 21.4 1-Core 33.4 2-Core 65.5 22% 40.1 Pts	4-Core 64.9 8-Core 66.5 9% 65.7 Pts	64-Core 64.7 4% 64.7 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 3650 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 2% AMD(1002 0B42) 512MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.0 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 4.23 Parallax 1.22 2% 2.61 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.78 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: R052 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 61 36 32 42 27 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18% Very poor	Read 118 Write 92.5 Mixed 103 SusWrite 44.4 20% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 1.8 33% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 42.8 DQ Mixed 12.8 15% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS725032A9A 320GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 240GB free Firmware: PC3O SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 65 88 88 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 89.8 Write 74.3 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 83.6 55% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 836GB free Firmware: HP63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 89 89 91 89 89 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 111 Write 89.3 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 85.7 61% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 780GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 30 31 31 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 30.2 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 29.5 20% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.1 93% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 512, 512, 1024, 1024 MB Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 310 13% 310 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire T160 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire T160

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+AMD $84Bench 34%, 2,640 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 6100NvidiaBench 0%, 335 samples	1x

RAM
2GBUnknownBench 15%, 9,823 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $84

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer Aspire T160

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Acer Aspire T160

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)