MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7522
MotherboardMSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 10:40
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 96.8
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 160
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 406
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 74.6
47% 64.9 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 58
Splatting 52
46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 55 74 94 39 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 202
Write 221
Mixed 189
SusWrite 71.5
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 24.5
86% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 141
116% 167 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 100%
Tph00901000gb 0 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3PA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 134 136 136 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 127
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 136
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 51.1
78% 51.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Pro-E (MS-7522) Builds (Compare 867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback