Asus GL552JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL552JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552JX
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150205
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 10:30
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 43
38% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 60.6
8-Core 84.4
9% 72.5 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 1A8D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1681
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 16.1
13% 14.4 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 15.2
12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900NS38 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 72 120 134 108 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.4% Average
Read 266
Write 240
Mixed 230
SusWrite 110
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 24.7
79% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 137
104% 140 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 81%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
370GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 120 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 117
Write 112
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 118
67% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 0420 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 4.5
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552JX Builds (Compare 627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback