Asus GL552JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemAsus GL552JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552JX
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150205
Uptime17.8 Days
Run DateNov 10 '18 at 06:37
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 52
2-Core 77.1
46% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 169
17% 138 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 1A8D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5946
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 18.3
17% 18.1 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 16.2
12% 15 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900NS38 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 139 119 122 157 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 330
Write 254
Mixed 267
SusWrite 127
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 35.4
124% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 157
133% 191 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 81%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 121 122 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 118
Write 96.7
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 120
65% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 0420 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552JX Builds (Compare 627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback