bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DP55WB
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 01:59
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 129
60% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 303
32% 259 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 (SLI Disabled)
Asus(1043 82FF) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 7.62
Parallax 5
16% 10.9 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 8.87
Splatting 6.04
6% 7.83 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 240GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF042C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 134 85 103 76 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47% Average
Read 231
Write 210
Mixed 205
SusWrite 101
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 24
79% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 127
103% 146 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 47%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
220GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 122 121 122 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 131
Write 147
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 122
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393930353430332D3031312E4130334C4620 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.6% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback