Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '18 at 18:06
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 200
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 503
57% 447 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 37.8
35% 41.2 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 34.6
30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 46 14 30 66 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.8% Poor
Read 170
Write 96.8
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 68.1
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 11
47% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 11.7
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 12.2
10% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
181GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59% Above average
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 71
SusWrite 92.8
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-041.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback